If you’ve ever went to to or listened to a online athletic compensation administrative hearing you will note a great deal of factual statements are offered without deep scrutiny (how did those steroids end up in your system? Uhhh, I believe I took some poor supplements..). We now have a ideal litmus test to see exactly how much deception athletic commissions are prepared to tolerate as well as it comes courtesy of UFC light heavyweight champion Jon Jones.
Earlier this year Jones was brought before the NSAC to response for a pre-fight brawl he participated in with Daniel Cormier while promoting their upcoming UFC light heavyweight championship bout. Jones admitted to wrongdoing as well as in asking for leniency in punishment noted that he already dealt with steep Camiseta Club Tijuana repercussions from the brawl leading the compensation to believe he lost his profitable Nike sponsorship because of this event. Referring to the Nike sponsorship Jones declared, after being sworn to tell the truth, as complies with to the government commission:
“I’ve dealt with some punishment already. I’ve lost a extremely huge endorsement of mine. One of my biggest.”
When asked about the value of the lost endorsement Jones verified its “my Nike deal”.
Jones’ lawyer, who verified at the outset that the function of going to the Camiseta Selección de fútbol de Corea del Sur hearing was to request leniency, noted as complies with as to the value of the lost offer “its over six figures…its quite damaging if you truly think about it“.
Jones now confesses he “worded it wrong“. In other words, Camiseta Selección de fútbol de Costa Rica the compensation was deceived if they ‘considered’ that Jones lost an ‘over six figure’ Nike sponsorship because of the Cormier brawl. MMA combating has the story noting:
“When I was in front of the commission, I certainly worded it wrong,” Jones stated on a UFC 182 media seminar call. “Nike did not decrease me since of that fight as well as I type of owe an apology to Nike for stating they dropped me since of the fight. They really didn’t. Nike has been understood to support its athletes with much worse things than a brawl in the middle of MGM [Grand]…
“It was already official,” stated Jones…”Everybody at headquarters knew. My team understood that I wasn’t gonna do my third year with Nike. as well as then we got into the brawl.”…
“The reality of the matter is, I did not get dropped by Nike,” Jones said. “It was a shared thing, something we had discussed months before the actual fight.”
Perhaps many importantly, during the deliberations the compensation noted Jones’s ‘contriteness’ in not suspending him however instead imposing neighborhood service as a punishment.
Jones apologized to Nike however its the compensation he ought to be concerned about. This deception ought to not be taken lightly as it impacts the integrity of their decision making process. NSAC guideline 467.885(3) particularly enables the compensation to “suspend or revoke the permit of, otherwise discipline” a combatant who “Provided false or misleading info to the compensation or a representative of the Commission“.
Now lets see exactly how this unfolds.
Share this:
Twitter
Facebook
Like this:
Like Loading…
Related
Options for the UFC as well as the Nevada specify athletic compensation in the deal with of the Jon Jones ScandalApril 28, 2015With 2 comments
Will the Nevada specify athletic compensation seek CIR testing for Jon Jones?January 8, 2015With 1 comment
Regulatory thoughts on the UFC’s unexpected location switch from Nevada to CaliforniaDecember 24, 2018